"Do you believe that America is more of a Nation under God or more of a Nation under
Government these days and please explain the advantages and disadvantages of each?"
Why not ask candidates directly. The following are some differences.
A Nation under God is built on a foundation of stone (the Bible and Constitution) while a
Nation under Government is built on a foundation of sand (no documents for either
morality or governance).
A Nation under God pushes all decisions as close to the local community as possible while a
Nation under Government wants all decisions made as far away from the local community as possible.
A Nation under God doesn't have Federal Income Tax while a Nation under Government has Federal Income Tax.
A Nation under God believes that "no person should gain control over another person" while a Nation under
Government believes the Government must control everything (Preachers ask yourself what Jesus taught
about controlling others).
This question is intended to be a fun one for candidates who believe that America
is better off as a Nation under God to answer as it gives them both an opportunity to state
their core convictions and allows an opportunity to educate voters in their district
as to the fact that America is now more of a Nation under Government than a Nation
under God. To solve a problem you must first identify the problem. Some think the
problem is that there is not enough Government and some think
the problem is that there is not enough God. Will voters get an idea where a the core
convictions of a candidate is when they see this answered on video? Will it hurt to find out?
"If elected will you vote for or against the legislation that creates a fairer way
to handle the abortion issue by simulating how a Nation under God would handle the abortion issue?"
One of the differences between a Nation under God and a Nation under Government is that
a Nation under God pushes all decisions down to the lowest level
possible. Because of this it is possible to correct questionable Supreme Court decisions by
designing and passing legislation to allow that States to make the decision.
Essentially what this does is to simulate how a Nation under God would handle that
issue. Below is a booklet that shows how this can be done for the abortion issue.
The booklet can be either downloaded
for free by clicking on the links below or it can be ordered as a booklet. Please contact
us directly if you want to order some booklets. The front and back covers follow the links
to download. The current goal is to make sure that the anniversary of Federal Income Tax
does not pass unnoticed. If you like the fairness of the legislation proposed below please
check back here a few weeks after the Super Bowl to learn how you can help get this
legislation moved forward.
"If same sex child molesters marry solely to gain the 'right' to adopt children
please explain who you believe should apologize to each adopted child that
does get molested?"
A question with a similar objective would be:
"If given a chance would you vote for or against same sex marriage and please explain
what your position will be when three or more men want to get married and adopt children?"
To give you an idea of the reason for these two questions please consider
the likely answer to them for every candidate that believes that America
is better off as a Nation under God.
This candidate will take advantage of the foundation of stone that a Nation
under God is built on. This candidate has the Bible and the original
Constitution to believe in. That candidate should always answer along
the lines that the Bible is very clear that the definition of marriage
is always between one man and one woman.
This candidate should leave the apologizing to children adopted by child
molesters to candidates that believe in a Nation built on a foundation of
sand as a Nation under Government has no document for morality to stop this.
Those candidates must come up with some new law to stop child molesters
from taking advantage of the "right" for same sex couples to adopt children
that they helped to create by overriding the wisdom contained in the Bible.
How will candidates with no document for morality handle the following scenarios?
Three or more men wanting to marry and adopt children.
Three or more women wanting to marry and adopt children.
One man wanting to marry multiple women
One woman wanting to marry multiple men
Two men wanting to marry three or more women
Candidates that would vote for same sex marriage believe that the advice in the
Bible should be ignored on marriage. Since they have no moral document to follow
they must come up with an answer for all the scenarios listed above (including
child molesters getting married on paper only). What will the answers be? If
three or more men say they love each other and want to adopt children what right
do they have to say no to this? Many, probably most, Christians will not
accuse the three men of not loving each other but they will vote against allowing
them to marry in their State if given the chance. The scenarios listed above are
all handled by the wisdom contained in the Bible. Perhaps someday soon those who
believe that America is better off a Nation under Government will produce their
documents for morality and Governance. How will their wisdom survive close scrutiny?
“What two cultures or religions regularly produce extremist that kill?”
The following is our answer to the above question. Gun control is an issue that normally gives some
indication of which ideology that a candidate belongs to. Our answer should give you a good idea of
why this question was asked in this manner. How it is answered will likely prove interesting as the answers were all
over the place for what culture regularly produces extremist that kill from the people that were asked it.
The above question has been asked of quite a few people and the response has been interesting to say the
least. One half of the question most everyone agrees on. The other half has valid answers that cover a
very wide spectrum. My answer follows.
Anyone that mass murders innocent life with bombs, guns, knives and even cars are the extremist referred
to in the question. Suicide bombers fit this definition of extremist when their bombs kill the innocent.
The mass murders at Sandy Hook, Aurora, Columbine, etc. fit this definition as their guns took many innocent lives.
The only religion that regularly produces extremist that kill is Islam. Everyone knows there are no
Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, etc. suicide bombers produced on a regular basis. This is the half
most everyone agrees on.
The Sandy Hook extremist was another in a string of extremist killers that committed suicide. If you think
about it the Sandy Hook extremist is technically a suicide killer. Islam regularly produces suicide bombers.
America now regularly produces suicide killers and other extremist that mass murder with guns. Some culture
in America is cranking out these killers on a much to frequent basis.
So what culture is producing these extremist whether a suicide killer or just a killer? To keep this letter
short please visit a web site called the CongressOfHope.com where the argument is made that the battle for
America is not between two political parties but rather is between two ideologies. These two ideologies are
those that believe America is better off as a Nation under Government and those that believe America would
be better off as a Nation under God again.
I suspect that those that prefer that America becomes even more of a Nation under Government have created
the culture that is producing these extremist on a regular basis but more evidence is needed. Unfortunately
the question can’t be answered without gathering more evidence.
Since America is currently more of a Nation under Government let's take advantage of this and do what a
Nation under Government does best which is to pass laws and spend other people's money. Passing laws to
determine what culture is producing these extremists is dangerous for both ideologies as there is no
telling what the evidence gathered will reveal. When extremist kill it would help if a standardized form
was completed that would give researchers and the public consistent data to examine. A full tox screen for
all known legal and illegal drugs present in the body of the extremist would tell us how often prescription
or illegal drugs are involved. It would definitely help to gather information about the environment that
the extremists are raised in. This would help determine if any cultural factors are repeatedly present. Let's
find out what culture is producing these extremists by gathering the needed information in a logical manner.
In reality it might be too expensive to screen for all drugs but let's look into what can be screened for at
reasonable cost and the cost to gather information on the backgrounds of these extremist. A common thread of
these extremist is that they don’t seem to mind getting caught so it should be a simple matter for lawmakers
to come together on this issue and figure out how to pass laws that don't infringe on any civil liberties.
Unless our lawmakers are completely incompetent (as many suspect) they should be able to come up with a way
to make it easy to gather time sensitive data such as the presence of drugs to see where the evidence leads us.
The question at the beginning was intentionally worded slightly vague as the real intent was to start a
challenge between the two ideologies that are fighting for control of America. The challenge is to investigate
in a logical manner to find the cause of the problem. I suspect that the culture that believes America is better
off as a Nation under Government is producing the vast majority of these extremist as without a document for
morality most anything is acceptable behavior these days. Yet it is possible that the ideology that believes
America is better off as a Nation under God may be producing these extremist. An ideology that strives for
strong two-parent homes that monitor television time, video game time, studies the Bible, and only gives their
children mind altering drugs under extreme conditions could be responsible. There is no strong evidence
either way. Yet.
It seems that both ideologies are in agreement that some culture in America is producing extremist that kill
far too frequently. Hopefully everyone agrees that we don't want America to obtain the worldwide reputation for
producing extremist that kill on a regular basis that Islam has. The killing of such young, innocent children
at Sandy Hook crossed some internal line inside me. Enough is enough. Do both ideologies agree that it is time
to find out what culture is producing these extremist?
I am a little nervous that the evidence might prove that my ideology is producing these extremist but am
willing to take the challenge and gather the evidence. How about those who believe that America is better off
as a Nation under Government? Are you afraid to take the challenge? Please keep in mind that there is definitely
a possibility that something entirely unexpected is causing this problem. Is it time to find out?
"Do you believe the poor are better off living in a Nation
under God or a Nation under Government?"
This question is designed to find which Nation a candidate believes is doing a better job of helping
the poor. This is really a challenge to both ideologies. One ideology believes all the Government
programs they create are enabling the poor to rise up out of poverty. The other ideology
believes all these Government programs do is enable the poor to stay poor. Can either ideology prove
that they are correct?